Close Menu
InsideRacing.comInsideRacing.com

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Comprehensive assessment of the shifting power dynamics defining Formula 1’s radical 2026 era.

    Russell reigns supreme in Melbourne as Verstappen stages a defiant charge through the field.

    Ferrari stakes their claim: Leclerc and Hamilton lead the way in Melbourne

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    InsideRacing.comInsideRacing.com
    • HOME
    • FORMULA 1
    • MOTOGP
      • WorldSBK
    • SINGLE SEATERS
      • IndyCar
      • Formula E
      • Formula 2
      • Formula 3
      • Formula 4
    • RALLYING
      • WRC
      • Rally Raid
      • ERC
      • World RX
    • SPORTS CARS
      • 24H Series
      • WEC
      • GT
    InsideRacing.comInsideRacing.com
    Formula 1

    Carey tells F1 fans: History can’t ‘become a straightjacket’ to change

    RaiedOctober 17, 2020
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Outgoing Formula 1 CEO Chase Carey has urged the most passionate fans to not let history “become a straightjacket” to future changes.

    Over the next few years, F1 is set to undergo a radical overhaul with a new budget cap coming into effect in 2021 followed by all-new cars in 2022, along with other regulations aimed at closing up the field.

    But while those have been largely welcomed, other changes are facing a tougher time in winning over the critics, in particular, a push to replace some qualifying sessions with a reverse grid sprint race.

    However, Carey argues that opposition to altering the formats of sports is nothing new and then when it is introduced, more often than not those initially against are won over.

    “Most sports, when they’ve talked about changes, the hardcore fans resist change,” the Liberty Media chief said on F1’s Beyond the Grid podcast.

    Carey BraGP

    “Major League Baseball, when they had a designated hitter, everybody didn’t like it. The NBA put in a three-point line, the hardcores didn’t like it. You added teams to play-offs, you used to have the league champions play in the World Series, this year they had 16 teams compete.

    “Really in most of those cases, not all, but in most cases, those changes have ended up being viewed as positive, bringing fresh energy, bringing a fresh perspective,” he claimed.

    “I think you have to be careful that you don’t gimmick-up the sport, that you’re recognising the importance of history and the importance of what has made this sport special, but not let that become a straightjacket that doesn’t enable you to consider changes that may truly enhance the sport for fans.”

    Over the past decade, F1 has adopted many such changes such as DRS, standing restarts after red flags, a double points finale and adaptations to qualifying, some of which have stuck, others soon thrown away.

    As for the fate of the reverse grid qualifying sprint race, F1 had hoped an amendment not requiring a full majority vote would make implementing them easier as only Mercedes blocked the last effort earlier this year.

    More teams and most drivers have since reportedly re-joined the German manufacturer however, and Carey accepts any final decision will be done collectively.

    “I think a decision like the specific one about a qualifying race, I think is a group decision. From my perspective, we’re not going to dictate that,” the American continued.

    “Let’s tee it up, take about the pros and cons, do the appropriate homework of what we think again the benefits and issues with it, and have an honest discussion with everybody.

    Also Read:

    • Ricciardo fears reverse grid races would ‘devalue’ winning in F1
    • Red Bull, Sainz suggest one reverse grid F1 race to fulfil ‘curiosity’
    • Mercedes against F1 ‘messing’ with reverse grid races: ‘This is not WWE’

    “That’s where it’s important to have a spirit of partnership and not look at it as is this good or bad for me as a team, but is it good or bad for the sport, and make an informed judgement.

    “Is this a decision that we feel is respectful to the sport and create greater races for fans? At the end of the day, this is what this is all about.

    “Not every fan is ever going to like it, you’re never going to get to 100%, which is why we have to make the judgement is it something we think on balance will improve the sport.

    “Without making it sound like we’re just throwing ideas against a wall, we should always be trying to push ourselves to look at other ways to make the sport more interesting and exciting for fans.”

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Russell reigns supreme in Melbourne as Verstappen stages a defiant charge through the field.

    March 8, 2026

    Ferrari stakes their claim: Leclerc and Hamilton lead the way in Melbourne

    March 6, 2026

    Hadjar gets Verstappen support, makes ‘bold’ 2026 claim

    February 4, 2026
    Top Posts

    Sainz receives reprimand for actions following Brazilian GP crash

    November 4, 2024

    Mercedes fined €10,000 for tire pressure adjustments ahead Sao Paulo GP

    November 4, 2024

    Valentino Rossi makes a strong debut in the BMW M Hybrid V8

    November 5, 2024

    The end of an era: Why MotoGP is swapping Phillip Island’s cliffs for Adelaide’s streets?

    February 18, 2026

    About us

    February 11, 2019

    Terms of Service

    February 11, 2019
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    InsideRacing.com© 2016 - 2026. All Rights Reserved.
    • Contact us
    • Our Authors

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.