Close Menu
InsideRacing.comInsideRacing.com

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    McLaren’s double warning: Jeddah win masks Red Bull’s looming threat in title fight

    Piastri’s Jeddah Opportunity: Analyzing how rivals’ missteps propelled him to championship frontrunner

    Cool and composed, Piastri conquers Jeddah, seizing victory and the championship lead

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    InsideRacing.comInsideRacing.com
    • HOME
    • FORMULA 1
    • MOTOGP
    • SINGLE SEATERS
      • IndyCar
      • Formula E
      • Formula 2
      • Formula 3
      • Formula 4
    • RALLYING
      • WRC
      • Rally Raid
      • World RX
    • SPORTS CARS
      • 24H Series
      • WEC
      • GT
    InsideRacing.comInsideRacing.com
    Formula 1

    F1 manufacturers split on evolution or revolution with new engine

    Inside RacingAugust 14, 2021
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Formula 1 engine manufacturers are split over what direction to take with the new power unit set for 2025 or 2026.

    So far, it has been confirmed the aim is to make the next generation of engines cheaper and more efficient with greater electrification and 100% sustainable fuels.

    However, according to Auto Motor und Sport, the disagreement is over the engine formula with Red Bull, who will launch their new Powertrains division next year, and Ferrari arguing for a return to noisier engines with four cylinders.

    “I think that the combustion engine does have a future, so why not introduce high revving engines that sound fantastic, and that are doing it in an environmentally friendly manner?” Horner said earlier this summer.

    Also Read:

    • Porsche admit 2025 F1 engines could be of ‘great interest’
    • Red Bull urges F1 to ‘do something different’ with new engine after Austria talks

    “I think that biofuel and sustainable fuels enable you to do that.

    “Electrification, I know, politically it’s being pushed, but actually is it the right route for 25 and 30 years’ time?

    “I think F1 could play a key role with the fuels and with the fuel partners that we have on sustainability and zero emissions, with a high-performance, high revving emotive engine.

    “Wouldn’t it be fantastic if we went that route? I’m sure every Grand Prix would be packed.”

    However, perhaps unsurprisingly given their domination of the V6 hybrid era, Mercedes are keen for more of an evolution rather than a revolution.

    “I would disagree with Christian because it’s what we think, but we are not the most relevant generation anymore,” said team boss Toto Wolff.

    M208395

    “When you ask an 18-year-old or 22-year-old, what relevance noise has, most of these guys consume it via different screens where noise has little or no relevance.

    “I personally like it too, and I’d like to have a 12-cylinder that screams down the road. But, as a matter of fact, we are a sport and we are a business.

    “I think we would lose complete relevance with our partners, sponsors, and major stakeholders if we weren’t looking at the environment and the impact that we make.

    “I think it would be totally misaligned of where the world is moving, and probably turn every single business partner away from F1 if we stick with internal combustion engines that scream, even though we may like them.”

    Renault was a big backer of four-cylinder engines when the current power unit regulations were being negotiated back in 2010/2011.

    A decade on, however, that view has changed.

    “If we have CO2-neutral fuel, we don’t need a four-cylinder engine,” executive director Marcin Budkowski was quoted by PlanetF1.

    “The V6 is already there. Why reinvent the wheel? It would mean massive modifications to the car, more weight and more cost.”

    jm2101au282

    Audi or Porsche, both of which are owned by VW, are also known to be interested in the new power unit regulations.

    But if the manufacturers can’t make their own decision by the Italian Grand Prix next month, AMuS also reports the FIA could step in to postpone the new engine until 2026, giving the governing body and F1 complete freedom to come up with their own regulations.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    McLaren’s double warning: Jeddah win masks Red Bull’s looming threat in title fight

    April 21, 2025

    Piastri’s Jeddah Opportunity: Analyzing how rivals’ missteps propelled him to championship frontrunner

    April 20, 2025

    Cool and composed, Piastri conquers Jeddah, seizing victory and the championship lead

    April 20, 2025
    Top Posts

    Liam Lawson unfazed by potential partnership with Max Verstappen at Red Bull

    November 10, 2024

    Norris blasts F1’s red flag rule after Sao Paulo setback

    November 4, 2024

    Sainz senior responds to speculation about Red Bull negotiations

    November 1, 2024

    Sainz receives reprimand for actions following Brazilian GP crash

    November 4, 2024

    Marquez and Mir Exchange Blows Over Thailand MotoGP Incident

    October 30, 2024

    Red Bull locks in Perez for 2025 amidst commercial power play

    November 12, 2024
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Inside Racing© 2016 - 2025. All Rights Reserved.
    • Contact us
    • Our Authors

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.