Close Menu
InsideRacing.comInsideRacing.com

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    McLaren’s double warning: Jeddah win masks Red Bull’s looming threat in title fight

    Piastri’s Jeddah Opportunity: Analyzing how rivals’ missteps propelled him to championship frontrunner

    Cool and composed, Piastri conquers Jeddah, seizing victory and the championship lead

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    InsideRacing.comInsideRacing.com
    • HOME
    • FORMULA 1
    • MOTOGP
    • SINGLE SEATERS
      • IndyCar
      • Formula E
      • Formula 2
      • Formula 3
      • Formula 4
    • RALLYING
      • WRC
      • Rally Raid
      • World RX
    • SPORTS CARS
      • 24H Series
      • WEC
      • GT
    InsideRacing.comInsideRacing.com
    MotoGP

    Marquez responds to viegas, it’s not just about money in valencia

    Inside RacingNovember 1, 2024
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Marc Marquez has responded to comments from FIM president Jorge Viegas, who suggested that canceling the MotoGP Valencia Grand Prix would negatively impact the local economy.

    The race is scheduled to take place at the Ricardo Tormo Circuit near Valencia from November 15-17, but recent deadly flooding in the region has raised concerns about the event. With over 150 lives lost and extensive damage to infrastructure, the viability of the race is uncertain.

    Despite this, MotoGP remains committed to holding the event, even considering a possible week-long delay, though many facilities are currently being used to shelter those affected by the floods.

    Viegas stated to Sky Italy that not racing in Valencia would be detrimental to the Valencian Community and its economy. In response, reigning world champion Francesco Bagnaia declared that he would not participate in the race if it went ahead, even at the cost of losing the championship title.

    Marquez supported Bagnaia’s stance and criticized Viegas’ comments, emphasizing the need for a broader perspective: “Of course, before making a decision, you need to evaluate everything—especially Pecco’s decision. But I keep saying: thinking about a GP in two weeks is nonsensical.

    “It’s not just about helping the economy; it’s about the human aspect. People are losing everything, and the streets are in ruins. The situation in Valencia is catastrophic; it’s like a scene from a movie. Many are currently living in the circuit facilities.

    “So, this isn’t merely about financial implications. While money can aid recovery, the championship must recognize the bigger picture. As a human and a Spaniard, I cannot fathom holding a GP there in two weeks.”

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Honda’s €30 Million Mega-Offer: Can They Steal MotoGP Sensation Pedro Acosta?

    April 15, 2025

    Marquez dominates Qatar MotoGP and extends championship lead after brotherly clash.

    April 13, 2025

    Qatar MotoGP Sprint surprise: Quartararo unleashes Yamaha pace, exceeds expectations!

    April 13, 2025
    Top Posts

    Liam Lawson unfazed by potential partnership with Max Verstappen at Red Bull

    November 10, 2024

    Norris blasts F1’s red flag rule after Sao Paulo setback

    November 4, 2024

    Sainz senior responds to speculation about Red Bull negotiations

    November 1, 2024

    Sainz receives reprimand for actions following Brazilian GP crash

    November 4, 2024

    Marquez and Mir Exchange Blows Over Thailand MotoGP Incident

    October 30, 2024

    Red Bull locks in Perez for 2025 amidst commercial power play

    November 12, 2024
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Inside Racing© 2016 - 2025. All Rights Reserved.
    • Contact us
    • Our Authors

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.